Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17005470›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2006

Significance of the immunohistochemical detection of lymph node micrometastases in stage II colorectal carcinoma.

José A García-Sáenz, María C Sáenz, Lucía González, Pedro Pérez-Segura, Javier Puente, Sara López-Tarruella, Javier Sastre, Antonio Casado, José G López-Asenjo, Eduardo Díaz-Rubio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic value of the detection of lymph node micrometastases in colon cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2008
    Article
  6. The clinical significance of lymph node micrometastasis in stage I and stage II colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2008
    Article
  7. Can the clinical outcome in stage II colon carcinomas be predicted by determination of molecular marker expression?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José A García-SáenzOncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. jagsaenz@yahoo.com
María C Sáenz
Lucía González
Pedro Pérez-Segura
Javier Puente
Sara López-Tarruella
Javier Sastre
Antonio Casado
José G López-Asenjo
Eduardo Díaz-Rubio
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival results of stage II colorectal cancer patients have led to major efforts to identify the subset of patients at risk for disease relapse and adjuvant therapies benefit. Immunohistochemistry is being explored to detect undetectable microscopic lymph node micrometastases. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of a 105 consecutive stage II colorectal cancer patients was performed. Two four-micres sections were obtained from each lymph node. These slides were stained with AE1-AE3 monoclonal antibodies against cytoskeleton using DAKO EnVision visualization system. Micrometastases were identified either as isolated cells or as well-defined glandular cell clusters with cytoplasm but not the nucleus stained with cytoskeleton antibodies.

results665 lymph nodes isolated from 105 patients were analyzed. Lymph nodes micrometastases were assessed in 26 out of the 105 patients. 42 (6.3%) out of 665 lymph nodes were infiltrated. Most of these metastases consisted of isolated cell cluster localized in marginal and interfollicular sinus of lymph nodes. The relapse rate was 23.1% among the patients with immunohistochemical detected lymph node micrometastes and 20.3% for the patients without lymph node involvement. This result lacked statistical significance (p = 0.759). DISCUSSION: AE1/AE3 lymph node immunohistochemical staining in stage II colorectal cancer is an interesting biological phenomenon but it fails to identify patients at higher risk of relapse who deserve a more aggressive adjuvant attitude.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKeratinsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesKeratins

Identifiers

PMID17005470
OpenAlexW2140943814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.