ReviewJournal of anatomy2006
How to build and rebuild a lens.
Review in Journal of anatomy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Senescent cells enhance newt limb regeneration by promoting muscle dedifferentiation.Aging cell · 2023Article
- Salamanders: The molecular basis of tissue regeneration and its relevance to human disease.Current topics in developmental biology · 2021Review
- Diverse Evolutionary Origins and Mechanisms of Lens Regeneration.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Review
- Lens regeneration: a historical perspective.The International journal of developmental biology · 2018Review
- Adapting biodegradable oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels for pigment epithelial cell encapsulation and lens regeneration.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2010Article
- MiRNA expression in the eye.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2008Review
- Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Evolution has used many different strategies to build eyes and lenses. However, the genetic regulation involved seems to be quite conserved. Likewise, the regeneration of eye structures is remarkable, especially in salamanders. This review outlines the basic mechanisms of lens regeneration and its induction and the possibility of creating lenses by transdifferentiation of the pigment epithelial cells, by stem cells or by bioengineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.