ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2007
Assessment of non-reperfused and reperfused myocardial infarction using diffusible or deposited radiolabelled perfusion imaging agents.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging of Heart Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein Under Acute Reperfusion Ischemia Using Radio-labeled Antibody in Rat Heart Model.Annals of nuclear cardiology · 2022Article
- In vivo molecular imaging of myocardial angiogenesis using the alpha(v)beta3 integrin-targeted tracer 99mTc-RAFT-RGD.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncomplete microvascular reperfusion is often observed in patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy or angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction and has important prognostic implications. We compared the myocardial uptake of diffusible ((201)Tl) and deposited ((99m)TcN-NOET) perfusion imaging agents in the setting of experimental infarction.
methodsRats were subjected to permanent coronary occlusion (OCC, n=10) or to 45-min occlusion and reperfusion (REP, n=17). Seven days later, the tracers were co-injected and the animals were euthanised 15 min (all ten rats in the OCC group and 12 rats in the REP group) or 120 min (five rats from the REP group, euthanised at this time point to evaluate any redistribution of the tracers: REP-RED group) afterwards. Infarct size determination and (99m)TcN-NOET/(201)Tl ex vivo imaging were performed. Regional flow and tissue oedema were quantified using radioactive microspheres and (99m)Tc-DTPA, respectively.
results(99m)TcN-NOET and (201)Tl defect magnitudes were similar in OCC animals (0.11+/-0.01 vs 0.13+/-0.01). In REP animals, (201)Tl defect magnitude (0.25+/-0.02) was significantly lower than the magnitude of (99m)TcN-NOET and flow defects (0.14+/-0.03 and 0.17+/-0.01, respectively; p<0.05), despite the lack of (201)Tl redistribution (REP-RED animals). (99m)Tc-DTPA indicated the presence of oedema in the reperfused area. Blood distribution studies showed that, unlike (99m)TcN-NOET, (201)Tl plasma activity was mostly unbound to plasma proteins.
conclusion(99m)TcN-NOET and (201)Tl delineated the non-viable area in chronic non-reperfused and reperfused myocardial infarction. The significantly decreased (201)Tl defect in reperfused infarction was likely due to partial diffusion of the tracer from the plasma into the oedema present in the infarcted area. Deposited perfusion tracers might be better suited than diffusible agents for the assessment of regional flow following reperfusion of myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.