Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17004064›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2006

[Emergency treatment of thoracic trauma].

U Klein, R Laubinger, A Malich, A Hapich, W Gunkel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Bilateral thoracic trauma-"double the trouble"?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Acute emergency care and airway management of caustic ingestion in adults: single center observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2016
    Observational
  5. Ventilation in chest trauma.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock · 2011
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

U KleinKlinik für Anaesthesie und operative Intensivtherapie, Südharz-Krankenhaus, Dr. Robert Koch-Strasse 39, 99734 Nordhausen. uwe.klein@shk-ndh.de
R Laubinger
A Malich
A Hapich
W Gunkel
Südharz Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracic trauma, most often associated with other serious injuries, is the main cause of death in the first 45 years of life. The percentage of chest injuries in multiple trauma, mainly from blunt impact, has remained relatively constant at 80% during the last 30 years. Isolated thoracic injuries comprise only 25% of all trauma cases, 90% of chest injuries are due to blunt impact, while penetrating injuries make up 5-10%. Since 25% of deaths from trauma are attributable to chest injuries, they determine the survival rate in multiple trauma to a significant extent. The pattern of chest injuries is variable, frequently in different combinations comprising rib cage and diaphragm, lung parenchyma, airway and mediastinal organs. This article details the immediate simultaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the prehospital phase, management in the emergency room, the relative importance of computed tomography, ultrasound examination and endoscopy in the primary diagnostic evaluation and the principles of anaesthetic management of thoracic trauma.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAdultAgedAnesthesiaBlood SubstitutesBlood VolumeChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMiddle AgedPain ManagementRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory MechanicsThoracic InjuriesWounds, NonpenetratingBlood Substitutes

Identifiers

PMID17004064
OpenAlexW2604896690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.