ArticleJAMA2006
Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome.
Article in JAMA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
176 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 385 citations in OpenAlex.
- Worldwide variation in lynch syndrome screening: case for universal screening in low colorectal cancer prevalence areas.Familial cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018Pooled it
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Expert Statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014Guideline
- Implementation of a Systematic Tumor Screening Program for Lynch Syndrome in an Integrated Health Care Setting.Familial cancer · 2019Trial
- Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Trial
- Pan-cancer prevalence of microsatellite instability and Lynch syndrome in India.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Performance of LFSPRO prediction in TP53 mutation status for prospectively collected probands.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Mendelian Risk Prediction Model That Aggregates Across Genes and Cancers.Genetic epidemiology · 2026Article
- From theory to practice: improving Lynch syndrome recognition through evidence-based education.Familial cancer · 2026Review
- Lynch Syndrome in Focus: A Multidisciplinary Review of Cancer Risk, Clinical Management, and Special Populations.Cancers · 2025Review
- PERSONALIZED RISK PREDICTION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A GENERALIZED BAYESIAN SEMI-PARAMETRIC MODEL OF RECURRENT EVENTS WITH COMPETING OUTCOMES.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- Comparison of PREMM5 and PREMMplus Risk Assessment Models to Identify Lynch Syndrome.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Challenges due to a Germline Missense MSH2 Variant in a Patient With Immunotherapy-Responsive Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictive Biomarkers and Resistance Mechanisms of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Validating Risk Prediction Models for Multiple Primaries and Competing Cancer Outcomes in Families With Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Using Clinically Ascertained Data.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- LFSPROShiny: An Interactive R/Shiny App for Prediction and Visualization of Cancer Risks in Families With Deleterious GermlineJCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- A comprehensive analysis of clinical and polygenic germline influences on somatic mutational burden.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- A new subtype of Lynch syndrome associated withFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
contextIdentifying families at high risk for the Lynch syndrome (ie, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) is critical for both genetic counseling and cancer prevention. Current clinical guidelines are effective but limited by applicability and cost.
objectiveTo develop and validate a genetic counseling and risk prediction tool that estimates the probability of carrying a deleterious mutation in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 and the probability of developing colorectal or endometrial cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: External validation of the MMRpro model was conducted on 279 individuals from 226 clinic-based families in the United States, Canada, and Australia (referred between 1993-2005) by comparing model predictions with results of highly sensitive germline mutation detection techniques. MMRpro models the autosomal dominant inheritance of mismatch repair mutations, with parameters based on meta-analyses of the penetrance and prevalence of mutations and of the predictive values of tumor characteristics. The model's prediction is tailored to each individual's detailed family history information on colorectal and endometrial cancer and to tumor characteristics including microsatellite instability.
main outcome measureAbility of MMRpro to correctly predict mutation carrier status, as measured by operating characteristics, calibration, and overall accuracy.
resultsIn the independent validation, MMRpro provided a concordance index of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.88) and a ratio of observed to predicted cases of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.05). This results in higher accuracy than existing alternatives and current clinical guidelines.
conclusionsMMRpro is a broadly applicable, accurate prediction model that can contribute to current screening and genetic counseling practices in a high-risk population. It is more sensitive and more specific than existing clinical guidelines for identifying individuals who may benefit from MMR germline testing. It is applicable to individuals for whom tumor samples are not available and to individuals in whom germline testing finds no mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.