Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17002951›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2006

Evidence for an apartheid-like social structure in early Anglo-Saxon England.

Mark G Thomas, Michael P H Stumpf, Heinrich Härke

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic legacy of state centralization in the Kuba Kingdom of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  4. In-frame seven amino-acid duplication inEuropean journal of endocrinology · 2017
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Community differentiation and kinship among Europe's first farmers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  9. The impact of recent events on human genetic diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The origins of lactase persistence in Europe.PLoS computational biology · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark G ThomasDepartment of Biology, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK. m.thomas@ucl.ac.uk
Michael P H Stumpf
Heinrich Härke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of migration in the Anglo-Saxon transition in England remains controversial. Archaeological and historical evidence is inconclusive, but current estimates of the contribution of migrants to the English population range from less than 10000 to as many as 200000. In contrast, recent studies based on Y-chromosome variation posit a considerably higher contribution to the modern English gene pool (50-100%). Historical evidence suggests that following the Anglo-Saxon transition, people of indigenous ethnicity were at an economic and legal disadvantage compared to those having Anglo-Saxon ethnicity. It is likely that such a disadvantage would lead to differential reproductive success. We examine the effect of differential reproductive success, coupled with limited intermarriage between distinct ethnic groups, on the spread of genetic variants. Computer simulations indicate that a social structure limiting intermarriage between indigenous Britons and an initially small Anglo-Saxon immigrant population provide a plausible explanation of the high degree of Continental male-line ancestry in England.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationHierarchy, SocialModels, TheoreticalComputer SimulationEmigration and ImmigrationEthnicityHistory, AncientHumansReproductionUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID17002951
PMCPMC1635457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.