Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17002854›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2006

Re-admission rates within 28 days of total hip replacement.

C Cullen, D S Johnson, G Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Readmission rates in the state of Florida: a reflection of quality?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Selecting the best prediction model for readmission.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C CullenDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, UK. claremc@gmail.com
D S Johnson
G Cook

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of the study was to identify the reasons for the higher than expected emergency re-admission to hospital within 28 days of total hip replacement (THR) for Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport. PATIENTS AND

methodsOver a 42-month period, 65 (8.5%) of 769 patients were re-admitted within 28 days of discharge following primary THR. Case notes for 61 patients were available for retrospective review to assess premorbidity, initial postoperative complications and reason for re-admission.

resultsThe main reasons for re-admission were complications related to the procedure. These included thrombo-embolic disease 2.5%, atraumatic dislocation 1.4%, wound complications 1.2% and swollen limb 1.8%. Other causes such as admission to another department for problems not related to THR accounted for 0.8%.

conclusionsOur findings are comparable with the published literature for early complications following THR. The three main reasons for re-admission were atraumatic dislocation, thrombo-embolic and wound complications such as superficial infection and haematoma are the commonest world-wide. The re-admission rate to hospital within the first 28 days following THR was a clinical indicator suggested by the UK Department of Health. It has subsequently been incorporated in a group of indicators used by the CASPE Healthcare Knowledge Systems (CHKS), a private healthcare consultancy and analysis company, for peer benchmarking. Our re-admission rates are inflated by admissions for non-THR-related reasons. The level of post-THR complications leading to re-admission were acceptable compared with the available published literature regarding 28-day re-admission. We anticipate that this study may act as a benchmark for other trusts.

Indexed as

Hip ProsthesisAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipEdemaEmergenciesEnglandFemaleHip DislocationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionProsthesis FailureProsthesis-Related Infections

Identifiers

PMID17002854
PMCPMC1964664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.