ArticleYeast (Chichester, England)2006
Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C genome annotation: a working hypothesis.
Article in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel ILP Framework to Identify Compensatory Pathways in Genetic Interaction Networks with GIDEON.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Time-resolved functional genomics using deep learning reveals global hierarchical control of autophagy.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Intergeneric chromosomal transfer in yeast results in improved phenotypes and widespread transcriptional responses.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The Saccharomyces Genome Database-a history of ideas and accomplishments, 1994-2026.FEMS yeast research · 2026Article
- Life beyond 6000 genes: from sequence to synthesis in a post-genomics era.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
- PacBio HiFi reads data sets for the ATCC-authenticated isolate of Candida albicans SC5314 (ATCC MYA-2876).Access microbiology · 2026Article
- A Saccharomyces cerevisiae knockout screen for genes critical for growth under sulfur- and nitrogen-limited conditions reveals intracellular sorting via vesicular transport systems.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Saccharomyces Genome Database: advances in genome annotation, expanded biochemical pathways, and other key enhancements.Genetics · 2025Article
- A convenient broad-host counterselectable system endowing rapid genetic manipulations of Kluyveromyces lactis and other yeast species.Microbial cell factories · 2024Article
- Massively integrated coexpression analysis reveals transcriptional regulation, evolution and cellular implications of the yeast noncanonical translatome.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Identifying the best PCR enzyme for library amplification in NGS.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- Recombination, admixture and genome instability shape the genomic landscape of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from spontaneous grape ferments.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- From beer to breadboards: yeast as a force for biological innovation.Genome biology · 2024Review
- Practical Approaches for the YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- gUMI-BEAR, a modular, unsupervised population barcoding method to track variants and evolution at high resolution.PloS one · 2023Article
- Origins, evolution, and physiological implications of de novo genes in yeast.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2022Review
- Yeast Genomics and Its Applications in Biotechnological Processes: What Is Our Present and Near Future?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Combining nucleotide variations and structure variations for improving astaxanthin biosynthesis.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The S. cerevisiae genome is the most well-characterized eukaryotic genome and one of the simplest in terms of identifying open reading frames (ORFs), yet its primary annotation has been updated continually in the decade since its initial release in 1996 (Goffeau et al., 1996). The Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD; www.yeastgenome.org) (Hirschman et al., 2006), the community-designated repository for this reference genome, strives to ensure that the S. cerevisiae annotation is as accurate and useful as possible. At SGD, the S. cerevisiae genome sequence and annotation are treated as a working hypothesis, which must be repeatedly tested and refined. In this paper, in celebration of the tenth anniversary of the completion of the S. cerevisiae genome sequence, we discuss the ways in which the S. cerevisiae sequence and annotation have changed, consider the multiple sources of experimental and comparative data on which these changes are based, and describe our methods for evaluating, incorporating and documenting these new data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.