Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17001039›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2006

A Consensus Data Mining secondary structure prediction by combining GOR V and Fragment Database Mining.

Taner Z Sen, Haitao Cheng, Andrzej Kloczkowski, Robert L Jernigan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Template-based protein modeling: recent methodological advances.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2010
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taner Z SenDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3020, USA. taner@iastate.edu
Haitao Cheng
Andrzej Kloczkowski
Robert L Jernigan
Iowa State University · US

Funding

Coarse-Grained Models of ProteinsR01GM072014 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
Discovery of Protein Seq.Struct.Func.RelationshipsR33GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2005 to 2006
$545k
Protein Sequence Structure Function RelationshipsR21GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2003 to 2004
$291k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R33GM066387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major aim of tertiary structure prediction is to obtain protein models with the highest possible accuracy. Fold recognition, homology modeling, and de novo prediction methods typically use predicted secondary structures as input, and all of these methods may significantly benefit from more accurate secondary structure predictions. Although there are many different secondary structure prediction methods available in the literature, their cross-validated prediction accuracy is generally <80%. In order to increase the prediction accuracy, we developed a novel hybrid algorithm called Consensus Data Mining (CDM) that combines our two previous successful methods: (1) Fragment Database Mining (FDM), which exploits the Protein Data Bank structures, and (2) GOR V, which is based on information theory, Bayesian statistics, and multiple sequence alignments (MSA). In CDM, the target sequence is dissected into smaller fragments that are compared with fragments obtained from related sequences in the PDB. For fragments with a sequence identity above a certain sequence identity threshold, the FDM method is applied for the prediction. The remainder of the fragments are predicted by GOR V. The results of the CDM are provided as a function of the upper sequence identities of aligned fragments and the sequence identity threshold. We observe that the value 50% is the optimum sequence identity threshold, and that the accuracy of the CDM method measured by Q(3) ranges from 67.5% to 93.2%, depending on the availability of known structural fragments with sufficiently high sequence identity. As the Protein Data Bank grows, it is anticipated that this consensus method will improve because it will rely more upon the structural fragments.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProtein Structure, SecondarySoftwareAmino Acid SequenceConsensusDatabases, ProteinElectronic Data ProcessingPeptide FragmentsSequence Homology, Amino AcidPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID17001039
PMCPMC2242411
OpenAlexW2006248076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.