Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16998754›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2006

Intravenous immunoglobulins as therapeutic option in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Ales Dudesek, Uwe K Zettl

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Paediatric clinically isolated syndromes: report of seven cases, differential diagnosis and literature review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 9 Human Immunoglobulins.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ales DudesekDepartment of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
Uwe K Zettl
University of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of neurological disorders with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is an increasing feature of practice for an expanding range of indications. This article reviews the current literature regarding the role of IVIG treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) and summarizes recommendations for the use of IVIG in different courses and clinical subsets of the disease. Principally based on the results of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) and a corresponding meta-analysis, the amount of evidence for the efficacy of IVIG treatment is currently most convincing for the relapsing-remitting course of MS (RRMS); nevertheless, it lags clearly behind that for beta interferon due to smaller study sizes, partial deficits in study design and not established optimal dosage. This prompted the basis for a consensus statement in some countries to recommend IVIG as second-line treatment in RRMS, when other licensed therapies (i. e., beta interferon, glatiramer acetate) are individually not tolerated due to side effects or concomitant disease. Recent evidence indicates that IVIG is also effective in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and should be considered as a therapeutic option, particularly when licensed immunotherapy can not be offered. During an acute relapse additional IVIG administration to established steroid treatment showed no benefit. Despite promising experimental data on promotion of remyelination, fixed chronic deficits were not reversed or improved by long-term IVIG treatment either. Currently there is no indication for IVIG treatment in the chronic progressive disease stages, since a large and well-designed RCT failed to show any beneficial effect in patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and data derived from primary progressive MS (PPMS) are still pending. However, preliminary results of a so far unpublished RCT including patients with PPMS and SPMS suggest a strong trend towards a beneficial effect in PPMS. So far, IVIG is the only therapy investigated for reducing postpartum relapses, whereas immunomodulatory drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy and lactation period. Data evaluating the peripartal use of IVIG along with the positive results of the trials in RRMS justify postpartal IVIG treatment particularly for mothers, who choose to breastfeed, under consideration of the recommendations specified for the relapsing-remitting disease course. As recently shown IVIG administration right from the early weeks of pregnancy appears to be a promising strategy, but cannot be recommended from the viewpoint of evidence-based medicine.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNervous System DiseasesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRecurrenceSyndromeImmunoglobulins, Intravenous

Identifiers

PMID16998754
OpenAlexW1964312786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.