Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16995882›Full record

ArticleImmunology2006

Effects of microflora on the neonatal development of gut mucosal T cells and myeloid cells in the mouse.

Amanda M Williams, Christopher S J Probert, Renata Stepankova, Helena Tlaskalova-Hogenova, Anne Phillips, Paul W Bland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The role of gut-immune-brain signaling in substance use disorders.International review of neurobiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Amanda M WilliamsDepartment of Clinical Science at South Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Christopher S J Probert
Renata Stepankova
Helena Tlaskalova-Hogenova
Anne Phillips
Paul W Bland
University of Bristol · GBCzech Academy of Sciences · CZUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust AL069896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonization with commensal flora in very early life may profoundly influence intestinal lymphoid development and bias later immune responses. We defined gut-homing T cell phenotypes and the influence of flora on intestinal immune development in mice. Intestinal T cells were phenotyped and quantified in conventional (CV), germfree (GF) and conventionalized germfree (GF/CV) neonatal mice by immunohistochemistry. Mucosal adressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MAdCAM-1) was expressed by mucosal vessels at birth in CV and GF mice and was more prevalent in CV than GF small intestine, but was distributed similarly and did not change with age. Less MAdCAM-1 was expressed in the colon; its distribution became restricted after weaning, with no difference between CV and GF mice. CD3(+)beta(7) (+) cells were present in similar numbers in CV and GF intestine at birth. They were CD62L(-) in CV mice and were accompanied by further CD3(+)beta(7) (+)CD62L(-) T cells as development progressed, but in GF and GF/CV intestine they expressed CD62L and numbers did not change. IEL numbers increased at weaning in CV mice in both small and large intestine, but showed delayed development in GF intestine. Macrophages were present at high levels from birth in GF intestine, but dendritic cells did not develop until day 16. Thus, fetus-derived T cells seed the intestinal lamina propria before birth via beta-MadCAM interactions. Their activation status depends on the microbiological status of the dam, and without a commensal flora they remain naive. We propose that these cells regulate antigen responsiveness of the developing mucosal T cell pool.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsAnimals, NewbornB-Lymphocyte SubsetsCell Adhesion MoleculesGerm-Free LifeImmunity, MucosalImmunophenotypingIntestinal MucosaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMucoproteinsMyeloid CellsT-Lymphocyte SubsetsCell Adhesion MoleculesMadcam1 protein, mouseMucoproteins

Identifiers

PMID16995882
PMCPMC2265821
OpenAlexW2042602182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.