Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16988099›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine & research2006

Current trends in plague research: from genomics to virulence.

Xiao-Zhe Huang, Mikeljon P Nikolich, Luther E Lindler

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine & research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pulmonary infection by Yersinia pestis rapidly establishes a permissive environment for microbial proliferation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao-Zhe HuangDivision of Communicable Immunology, Department of Bacterial Diseases, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA. xiaozhe.huang@na.amedd.army.mil
Mikeljon P Nikolich
Luther E Lindler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yersinia pestis is the causative agent of plague, which diverged from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis within the past 20,000 years. Although these two species share a high degree of homology at the DNA level (>90%), they differ radically in their pathogenicity and transmission. In this review, we briefly outline the known virulence factors that differentiate these two species and emphasize genetic studies that have been conducted comparing Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis. These comparisons have led to a better understanding of the genetic contributions to the differences in the virulence and pathogenicity between these two organisms and have generated information that can be applied in future diagnostic and vaccine development. Comparison of the genetic differences between Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis has also lent insight into the emergence of acute pathogens from organisms causing milder diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenes, BacterialGenomicsHumansModels, BiologicalMutagenesisPlaguePlasmidsResearchSpecies SpecificityVirulenceYersinia pestisYersinia pseudotuberculosisYersinia pseudotuberculosis Infections

Identifiers

PMID16988099
PMCPMC1570480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.