ArticleReviews in urology2002
The potential for prostate cancer chemoprevention.
Article in Reviews in urology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro Pro-Apoptotic and Anti-Migratory Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in Molecular Regulation of Prostate Cancer Cells by Top Natural Products of Malaysia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: what can be recommended to patients?Current urology reports · 2009Review
- Strategies for prostate cancer prevention: Review of the literature.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2008Article
- Green tea catechins suppress the DNA synthesis marker MCM7 in the TRAMP model of prostate cancer.Molecular oncology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dramatic international variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates suggests that changeable environmental factors exert an influence. This has prompted a search for ways to prevent the disease. Epidemiologic studies suggest that dietary factors such as the carotenoid lycopene, selenium, vitamin E, and high intake of fat have roles in prostate cancer risk. Several studies show that impairment of androgen synthesis lowers the risk of prostate cancer. 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors such as finasteride have been shown to decrease prostate size by decreasing androgenic stimulation to the prostate. Other promising, but less developed, interventions include vitamin D supplements and modification of diet. Any manipulation to decrease one's relative risk of prostate cancer will by necessity have to be given to a large proportion of men who would never develop prostate cancer even without the intervention. To be acceptable, a successful preventive intervention should have few or no side effects; some additional benefits would be useful. All potential preventive interventions will need to be rigorously evaluated before they can be advocated for prostate cancer prevention.
Identifiers
16986061PMC1476013W215128157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.