Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16985993›Full record

ArticleReviews in urology2001

Future trends in the treatment of urinary incontinence.

M B Chancellor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in urology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Single compartment drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2014
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M B Chancellor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticholinergic drugs act on efferent nerves to counteract overactive bladder (OAB) after it occurs. To prevent the occurrence of OAB, therapies should be directed at blocking the afferent nerves that control the bladder. Tachykinin-receptor antagonists hold great promise in this regard, since they can be administered orally and do not increase the risk of urinary retention that occurs with anticholinergics. Advanced drug delivery systems, such as controlled-release oral oxybutynin (oxybutynin-XL) can reduce the incidence of anticholinergic side effects. In a similar manner intravesical therapy for OAB is site specific, and thus also reduces the occurrence of adverse events. Moreover, the difficulties of intravesical therapy may now be overcome with advanced delivery techniques such as an implantable, long-acting drug-delivery pump. Another intravesical therapy that has met with great acceptance and success is the administration of chili pepper extracts, especially resiniferitoxin, which may be effective for up to 3 months with one application. Finally, gene therapy holds great promise for OAB, because it is possible to access all of the genitourinary organs via endoscopy and other minimally invasive techniques that are ideally suited for gene therapy.

Identifiers

PMID16985993
PMCPMC1476068
OpenAlexW185846926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.