Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16985906›Full record

ArticleReviews in urology2004

Sling and bulking agent placement procedures.

Alfred E Bent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in urology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alfred E Bent

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sling procedures have been used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence since the early 1900s. Traditional sling procedures are best performed with autologous rectus fascia or fascia lata, and the sling material should penetrate the urogenital diaphragm (perineal membrane) into the retropubic space. Tension-free slings using polypropylene have excellent efficacy and safety data and are applicable in an outpatient setting. They are a good firstline surgical choice. Periurethral bulking agents have application for patients with a relatively immobile bladder neck and in cases of medical compromise or a desire for a simple, office-type treatment.

Identifiers

PMID16985906
PMCPMC1472872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.