ArticleReviews in urology2005
The effective management of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer.
Article in Reviews in urology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multiplex platform for digital measurement of circular DNA reaction products.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Hsp70 and gama-Semino protein as possible prognostic marker of prostate cancer.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2018Review
- Performance characteristics and relationship of PSA value/kinetics on carbon-11 acetate PET/CT imaging in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017Article
- Evaluation of a rapid quantitative determination method of PSA concentration with gold immunochromatographic strips.BMC urology · 2015Article
- Motexafin lutetium-photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer: short- and long-term effects on prostate-specific antigen.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has become the primary method of monitoring patients following definitive therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. After surgery, an immediate detectable rise in PSA is correlated with subsequent local recurrence and/or metastasis. Following radiation therapy, biochemical failure is defined as 3 consecutive rises in PSA above the nadir. Treatment of postoperative or postradiation PSA recurrence involves several modalities, including luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists. Although studies have demonstrated the advantages of early hormone therapy, they have not addressed at what PSA level treatment should begin. A better understanding of PSA's kinetics will lead to a sense of when to begin treatment and when watchful waiting is the more appropriate course.
Identifiers
16985881PMC1477616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.