Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16985555›Full record

ArticleReviews in urology2006

Chemopreventive trials in urologic cancer.

Vahagn R Ashughyan, Sibylle Marihart, Bob Djavan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in urology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Recent advances on tea polyphenols.Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition) · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vahagn R Ashughyan
Sibylle Marihart
Bob Djavan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer prevention uses natural, synthetic, or biological chemical agents to reverse, suppress, or prevent carcinogenic progression. Chemoprevention trials are based on the hypothesis that interruption of the biological process involved in carcinogenesis will inhibit this process and, in turn, reduce cancer incidence. Bladder cancer chemoprevention trials demonstrate conflicting findings. Dietary fat, soy protein, garlic, and selenium have been reported to possess anticancer properties in the bladder, but they still remain largely unstudied in vivo. Regarding prostate cancer, vitamin D deficiency was reported to increase risk for the disease, and sunlight exposure is inversely proportional to prostate cancer mortality. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial reported a 24.4% prostate cancer incidence with placebo, compared with 18.4% with finasteride, and a reduction of 24.8% over 7 years. Dutasteride, a dual inhibitor of type 1 and type 2 5alpha-reductase, is the subject of the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events trial. Results are awaited from that study.

Identifiers

PMID16985555
PMCPMC1471769
OpenAlexW78660155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.