Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16983506›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2007

A Phase II study of SU5416 in patients with advanced or recurrent head and neck cancers.

Matthew G Fury, Andrew Zahalsky, Richard Wong, Ennapadam Venkatraman, Eric Lis, Lucy Hann, Timothy Aliff, William Gerald, Martin Fleisher, David G Pfister

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeting angiogenesis for treatment of human cancer.Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew G FuryHead and Neck Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Andrew Zahalsky
Richard Wong
Ennapadam Venkatraman
Eric Lis
Lucy Hann
Timothy Aliff
William Gerald
Martin Fleisher
David G Pfister
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USFaculty of 1000 (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSU5416 (semaxanib) is a synthetic small molecule inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase domain of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2). This Phase II study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of SU5416 in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancers. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was an open label, single arm, Phase 2 study for patients who had received no more than 2 cytotoxic regimens. Thirty-five patients received intravenous SU5416 (145 mg/m(2)) twice per week by intravenous catheter. Radiologic imaging for response assessment was planned at the conclusion of each 8 week cycle. Serum VEGF levels and power Doppler ultrasound tumor imaging were explored as potential surrogate markers for SU5416 activity.

resultsThirty-two patients had received prior radiotherapy, including 18 patients who received prior concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Twelve patients had received prior chemotherapy in the recurrent disease setting. Thirty-one patients were evaluable for response. There was one partial response and one minor response. The median number of 8-week cycles received was 1 (range 1-4). Median overall survival was 6.25 months. The most common > or = grade 3 toxicity was headache (31%). There was one fatal carotid artery hemorrhage. Fatigue, nausea, and vomiting were common grade 1-2 adverse events. Power Doppler ultrasound demonstrated decreased tumor vascularity in 5 of 7 patients.

conclusionsTreatment with SU5416 in patients with head and neck cancers is feasible, but objective responses are rare. Studies evaluating more potent anti-angiogenic agents in this disease are of interest.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsBlood PressureFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHeart RateHumansIndolesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Squamous CellPyrrolesRegional Blood FlowAngiogenesis InhibitorsIndolesPyrrolesSemaxinibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID16983506
OpenAlexW2041098552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.