Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16983148›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome.

Jian Ma, Louxin Zhang, Bernard B Suh, Brian J Raney, Richard C Burhans, W James Kent, Mathieu Blanchette, David Haussler, Webb Miller

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 300 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Random, fragile, or correlated: Mechanisms of synteny decay in mammals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reference-based read clustering improves theComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  13. Evolution of the ancestral mammalian karyotype and syntenic regions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jian MaCenter for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. jianma@bx.psu.edu
Louxin Zhang
Bernard B Suh
Brian J Raney
Richard C Burhans
W James Kent
Mathieu Blanchette
David Haussler
Webb Miller
University of California, Santa Cruz · USPennsylvania State University · USMcGill University · CANational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

UCSC Center for Genomic Science, and Minority Outreach ProgramP41HG002371 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H · 2001 to 2011
$34.8M
SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING BIOSEQUENCE DATAR01HG002238 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MILLER, WEBB COLBY · 2000 to 2010
$7.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02238NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002371NHGRI NIH HHS P41HG02371NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002238PHS HHS 22XS013A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article analyzes mammalian genome rearrangements at higher resolution than has been published to date. We identify 3171 intervals, covering approximately 92% of the human genome, within which we find no rearrangements larger than 50 kilobases (kb) in the lineages leading to human, mouse, rat, and dog from their most recent common ancestor. Combining intervals that are adjacent in all contemporary species produces 1338 segments that may contain large insertions or deletions but that are free of chromosome fissions or fusions as well as inversions or translocations >50 kb in length. We describe a new method for predicting the ancestral order and orientation of those intervals from their observed adjacencies in modern species. We combine the results from this method with data from chromosome painting experiments to produce a map of an early mammalian genome that accounts for 96.8% of the available human genome sequence data. The precision is further increased by mapping inversions as small as 31 bp. Analysis of the predicted evolutionary breakpoints in the human lineage confirms certain published observations but disagrees with others. Although only a few mammalian genomes are currently sequenced to high precision, our theoretical analyses and computer simulations indicate that our results are reasonably accurate and that they will become highly accurate in the foreseeable future. Our methods were developed as part of a project to reconstruct the genome sequence of the last ancestor of human, dogs, and most other placental mammals.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeGenome, HumanAlgorithmsAnimalsBase CompositionBase PairingChromosome BreakageChromosome InversionChromosome MappingChromosome PaintingChromosomesComputer SimulationDogsGene DeletionGene Rearrangement

Identifiers

PMID16983148
PMCPMC1665639
OpenAlexW2130640131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.