ArticleBone marrow transplantation2006
Clinical outcomes and direct hospital costs of reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Allogeneic transplantation for CML in the TKI era: striking the right balance.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
- Role of allo-SCT for CML in 2010.Bone marrow transplantation · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation was given to 19 patients (aged 15-59 years) in the first chronic phase and one patient in the accelerated phase with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after a regimen consisting of fludarabine (Flu), busulfan (Bu) and ATG Fresenius. The median follow-up was 27 months. Until day +100, no transplant-related mortality was recorded. The incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was 55 and 75%, respectively. Two patients (10%) died from GvHD. Fourteen (70%) patients achieved molecular remission. Additional post-transplant intervention (donor lymphocyte infusion, imatinib) was necessary, however, in 10 patients (50% of the patients; non-achievement of stable molecular remission or later relapses). The total direct cost of the transplantation treatment for all of the patients came to 1,572,880 euro. If the patients had been treated with imatinib and followed-up with the same time period as they were following a transplantation, the direct cost of the imatinib treatment would have been 2,005,117 euro. The transplantation treatment appears to be less expensive after approximately 2 years of follow-up. Flu+Bu+ATG is a low-toxicity regimen for patients with CML. However, a close follow-up is necessary and about 50% of the patients require further therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.