Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16980566›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2006

Divergence of the Dof gene families in poplar, Arabidopsis, and rice suggests multiple modes of gene evolution after duplication.

Xiaohan Yang, Gerald A Tuskan, Max Zong-Ming Cheng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genome-wide identification of theFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-Based Identification of the Dof Gene Family in ThreeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic Evidence Reveals Low Gelatinous Layer Biosynthesis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ectopic Expression ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohan YangDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA.
Gerald A Tuskan
Max Zong-Ming Cheng
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that gene duplication is a primary source of genetic novelty. However, the evolutionary fate of duplicated genes remains largely unresolved. The classical Ohno's Duplication-Retention-Non/Neofunctionalization theory, and the recently proposed alternatives such as subfunctionalization or duplication-degeneration-complementation, and subneofunctionalization, each can explain one or more aspects of gene fate after duplication. Duplicated genes are also affected by epigenetic changes. We constructed a phylogenetic tree using Dof (DNA binding with one finger) protein sequences from poplar (Populus trichocarpa) Torr. & Gray ex Brayshaw, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and rice (Oryza sativa). From the phylogenetic tree, we identified 27 pairs of paralogous Dof genes in the terminal nodes. Analysis of protein motif structure of the Dof paralogs and their ancestors revealed six different gene fates after gene duplication. Differential protein methylation was revealed between a pair of duplicated poplar Dof genes, which have identical motif structure and similar expression pattern, indicating that epigenetics is involved in evolution. Analysis of reverse transcription-PCR, massively parallel signature sequencing, and microarray data revealed that the paralogs differ in expression pattern. Furthermore, analysis of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates indicated that divergence of the duplicated genes was driven by positive selection. About one-half of the motifs in Dof proteins were shared by non-Dof proteins in the three plants species, indicating that motif co-option may be one of the forces driving gene diversification. We provided evidence that the Ohno's Duplication-Retention-Non/Neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization/duplication-degeneration-complementation, and subneofunctionalization hypotheses are complementary with, not alternative to, each other.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAmino Acid SequenceArabidopsisDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataOryzaPlant ProteinsPopulusTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16980566
PMCPMC1630746
OpenAlexW2074213315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.