ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2006
The best practices: use of the guidelines by ten state tobacco control programs.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distance education for tobacco reduction with Inuit frontline health workers.International journal of circumpolar health · 2013Article
- A Smoke-Free Paso del Norte: impact over 10 years on smoking prevalence using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Understanding the organization of public health delivery systems: an empirical typology.The Milbank quarterly · 2010Article
- The global burden of cancer: priorities for prevention.Carcinogenesis · 2010Article
- The impact of tobacco control programs on adult smoking.American journal of public health · 2008Article
- Tobacco control funding versus scientific evidence.American journal of preventive medicine · 2007Article
- Update on Performance in Tobacco Control: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Tobacco Control Policy and the US Adult Smoking Rate, 2011-2013.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention was the first national resource to define the nine required components of a comprehensive state tobacco control program. This evaluation examined how states used the guidelines in their program planning, and identifies strengths and weaknesses of the guidelines.
methodsDuring 2002-2003, data were collected and analyzed from ten state tobacco control programs on familiarity, funding, and use of the guidelines. Data were collected via written surveys and qualitative interviews with key tobacco control partners in the states. The typical number of participants interviewed was 17, representing an average of 15 agencies per state.
resultsLead agencies and advisory agencies were the most familiar with the guidelines, while other state agencies were less aware of the guidelines. Participants' prioritization of the nine components was closely related to the lead agencies' estimated category expenditures. Three states modified the guidelines to develop more-tailored frameworks. Major strengths of the guidelines included providing a basic program framework and state-specific funding recommendations. The guidelines did not address implementation strategies or tobacco-related disparities, and had not been updated with current evidence-based research.
conclusionsThe guidelines are important recommendations for state tobacco control programs. To continue to be useful to states, the guidelines need to be updated to address implementation and tobacco disparities, and include additional evidence-based examples. Active dissemination of updated guidelines needs to be increased beyond typical consumers to other tobacco control partners such as coalitions and other state agencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16979454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.