ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2006
Single-photon emission computed tomography in the screening for postoperative pulmonary embolism.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review on the clinical uses of SPECT/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2010Review
- Single photon emission computed tomography in pulmonary embolism - estimation of selected, scintigraphic regions of interests.Polish journal of radiology · 2010Article
- Is the lung scan alive and well? Facts and controversies in defining the role of lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of MDCT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of serial lung perfusion scintigraphy prospectively using single-photon emission computed tomographic image (SPECT) in screening for pulmonary embolism (PE) after elective surgery for gastrointestinal malignancy. PE was examined pre- and postoperatively with SPECT. Diagnosis of PE was based on segmental perfusion defect visualization in at least two of three planes on a SPECT image compared with preoperative SPECT images. Final diagnosis was determined by detection of embolus with multidetector helical CT (MDCT). No perioperative anticoagulant was used. Thirty-four patients were enrolled. One patient was excluded because of thrombophilia. In preoperative scans, nonsegmental defects were detected in 11 and a segmental defect in 1 patient, who was then diagnosed as PE preoperatively. Among 21 patients with normal preoperative SPECT, 2 had nonsegmental and 5 had segmental defects postoperatively. Among 11 patients with nonsegmental preoperative SPECT, 7 had nonsegmental and 4 had segmental defects postoperatively. Postoperative segmental defects were differentiated by their shape only and there was no need to compare pre- and postoperative SPECT. MDCT confirmed four patients with PE among nine with segmental defects postoperatively. Our results of screening for PE by visualization at least two planes of SPECT images suggest that postoperative SPECT scan is suitable for the diagnosis of postoperative PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.