Ethical writing should be taught.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Academic dishonesty in higher education: students' perceptions and involvement in an African institution.BMC research notes · 2016
   Article
2. Educating science editors: is there a comprehensive strategy?Croatian medical journal · 2014
   Article
3. A new example of unethical behaviour in the academic journal "medical archives".Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2014
   Article
4. Belittlement and harassment of medical students: remedial training--ethics and sensitivity.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Belittlement and harassment of medical students: remedial training--ethics and sensitivity.2006
• Comment on
  Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak.2006

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as