GuidelineThe Canadian journal of cardiology2006
Universal access: but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to cardiac rehabilitation.
Guideline in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02778165 (My Cardiac Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
My Cardiac Recovery (MyCaRe): A Pilot RCT to Examine the Effect of MyCaRe Android Application on Recovery Outcomes and Enrolment in Cardiac Rehab Post Cardiac Surgery.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of the time factors on the exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation outcomes of the patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Physician factors affecting cardiac rehabilitation referral and patient enrollment: a systematic review.Clinical cardiology · 2013Pooled it
- A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation.BMC health services research · 2012Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient strategies in increasing referral and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation: a prospective, multi-site study.Implementation science : IS · 2012Trial
- Examining the effect of a patient navigation intervention on outpatient cardiac rehabilitation awareness and enrollment.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and preventionTrial
- Human Healthcare and Its Pharmacy Component from a Safety Point of View.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinician's Commentary on Moncion et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2024Article
- 2023 TAMIS/TSOC/TACVPR Consensus Statement for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Rehabilitation.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Association of admission frailty and frailty changes during cardiac rehabilitation with 5-year outcomes.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Article
- The implementation of a value-based learning health system for preventative care in Ontario, Canada.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2023Article
- Review
- Immigrants, Ethnicity, and Adherence to Secondary Cardiac Prevention Therapy: A Substudy of the ISLAND Trial.CJC open · 2021Article
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Following Open Repair for a Proximal Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2020Article
- Telerehabilitation with live-feed biomedical sensor signals for patients with heart failure: a pilot study.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2019Article
- Predicting Long-Term Mortality, Morbidity, and Survival Outcomes Following a Cardiac Event: A Cardiac Rehabilitation Study.Rehabilitation process and outcome · 2019Article
- Telerehabilitation for patients with heart failure.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2015Article
- The Canadian Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry: Inaugural Report on the Status of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Canada.Rehabilitation research and practice · 2015Article
- Perceptions of cardiac rehabilitation patients, specialists and rehabilitation programs regarding cardiac rehabilitation wait times.BMC health services research · 2012Article
- Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society formed an Access to Care Working Group ('Working Group') in the spring of 2004. The mandate of the group was to use the best science and information to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for access to common cardiovascular services and procedures. The present commentary presents the rationale for benchmarks for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) services. The Working Group's search for evidence included: a full literature review of the efficacy of CR, and the factors affecting access and referral to CR; a review of existing guidelines for access to CR; and a national survey of 14 CR programs across Canada undertaken in May 2005 to solicit information on referral to, and wait times for, CR. The Working Group also reviewed the results of The Ontario Cardiac Rehabilitation Pilot Project (2002) undertaken by the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario, which reported the average and median wait times for CR. Some international agencies have formulated their own guidelines relating to the optimal wait time for the onset of CR. However, due to the limited amount of supporting literature, these guidelines have generally been formed as consensus statements. The Canadian national survey showed that few programs had guidelines for individual programs. The Cardiac Care Network of Ontario pilot project reported that the average and median times from a cardiac event to the intake into CR were 99 and 70 days, respectively. The national survey of sampled CR programs also revealed quite remarkable differences across programs in terms of the length of time between first contact to first attendance and to commencement of exercise. Programs that required a stress test before program initiation had the longest wait for exercise initiation. Some patients need to be seen within a very short time frame to prevent a marked deterioration in their medical or psychological state. In some cases, early intervention and advocacy may reduce the risk of loss of employment. Or, there may be profound disturbances in the patient's family as a result of the cardiac event. For other patient groups, preferable wait times vary from one to 30 days, and acceptable wait times vary from seven to 60 days. All cardiovascular disease patients require core aspects of CR services. Patients who would derive benefit from formal CR programs should be provided the opportunity, given the proven efficacy and cost effectiveness of CR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.