Depression in primary care: encouragement and caution for the business case.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Optimized antidepressant therapy and pain self-management in primary care patients with depression and musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA · 2009
   Trial
2. The Fracture of Relational Space in Depression: Predicaments in Primary Care Help Seeking.Current anthropology · 2016
   Article
3. Integrating depression care: the time has come.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013
   Article
4. Mental health services research: moving from academia to the community.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Cost-effectiveness of a disease management program for major depression in elderly primary care patients.2006
• Comment on
  Improving depression care in patients with diabetes and multiple complications.2006
• Comment on
  Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care: a randomized experiment.2006

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as