Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16969641›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2006

No changes in lung function after a saturation dive to 2.5 MPa with intermittent reduction in Po2 during decompression.

E Thorsen, K Segadal, L E B Stuhr, K Troland, M Grønning, S Marstein, A Hope

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Short- and long-term effects of diving on pulmonary function.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

E ThorsenInstitute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. einar.thorsen@helse-bergen.no
K Segadal
L E B Stuhr
K Troland
M Grønning
S Marstein
A Hope
Haukeland University Hospital · NONorwegian Womens Public Health Association · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOSykehuset i Vestfold · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decompression stress and exposure to hyperoxia may cause a reduction in transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide and in maximal aerobic capacity after deep saturation dives. In this study lung function and exercise capacity were assessed before and after a helium-oxygen saturation dive to a pressure of 2.5 MPa where the decompression rate was reduced compared with previous deep dives, and the hyperoxic exposure was reduced by administering oxygen intermittently at pressures of 50 and 30 kPa during decompression. Eight experienced divers of median age 41 years (range 29-48) participated in the dive. The incidence of venous gas microemboli was low compared with previous deep dives. Except for one subject having treatment for decompression sickness, no changes in lung function or angiotensin converting enzyme, a marker of pulmonary endothelial cell damage, were demonstrated. The modified diving procedures with respect to decompression rate and hyperoxic exposure may have contributed to the lack of changes in lung function in this dive compared with previous deep saturation dives.

Indexed as

DecompressionAdultAtmospheric PressureDivingHumansLungLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedOxygenPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ARespiratory Function TestsACE protein, humanOxygenPeptidyl-Dipeptidase A

Identifiers

PMID16969641
OpenAlexW2073106832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.