ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2006
Norovirus gastroenteritis.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Norovirus outbreaks: a systematic review of commonly implicated transmission routes and vehicles.Epidemiology and infection · 2013Pooled it
- Atomic force microscopy at the forefront: unveiling foodborne viruses with biophysical tools.Npj viruses · 2025Review
- Norovirus infection among HIV-infected patients in Abuja, Nigeria: impact of combination antiretroviral therapy status.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Evaluation of green tea extract as a safe personal hygiene against viral infections.Journal of biological engineering · 2018Article
- Saliva and viral infections.Periodontology 2000 · 2016Review
- Lyme disease: Current issues, implications, and recommendations for tourism management.Tourism management · 2015Review
- Article
- Food poisoning and diarrhea: small intestine effects.Current gastroenterology reports · 2011Review
- Institutional risk factors for norovirus outbreaks in Hong Kong elderly homes: a retrospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2011Article
- Comparison of the replication properties of murine and human calicivirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerases.Virus genes · 2011Article
- Epidemiological and virological investigation of a Norovirus outbreak in a resort in Puglia, Italy.BMC infectious diseases · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent epidemiologic studies have shown that norovirus is one of the most frequent causes of acute nonbacterial gastroenteritis. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and nucleotide sequencing are the means by which the hundreds of norovirus strains have been identified, named, and classified into genogroups and genetic clusters. They are also the means by which a particular strain is traced from the source of an outbreak throughout its spread. These molecular techniques have been combined with classic epidemiology to investigate norovirus outbreaks in diverse settings, including hospitals, nursing homes, dining locations, schools, daycare centers, and vacation venues. Outbreaks are difficult to control because of the apparent ease of transmission through food, water, person-to-person contact, and environmental surfaces. Almost all patients with norovirus gastroenteritis recover completely, but hospital and nursing home outbreaks have been associated with morbidity and mortality. The diagnostic and management approach to an individual patient is to use clinical and epidemiologic findings to rule out "not norovirus." At the first sign that there is an outbreak, strict compliance with cleaning, disinfection, and work release guidelines is important to prevent further spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16968608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.