Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16968392›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2006

Longitudinal epitope analysis of insulin-binding antibodies in type 1 diabetes.

T R Hall, J W Thomas, C J Padoa, C Torn, M Landin-Olsson, E Ortqvist, C S Hampe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Anti-Islet Autoantibodies in Type 1 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Islet Autoantibodies.Current diabetes reports · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

T R HallDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J W Thomas
C J Padoa
C Torn
M Landin-Olsson
E Ortqvist
C S Hampe
Lund University · SEUniversity of Washington · USKarolinska Institutet · SENational Health Laboratory Service · ZAVanderbilt University · US

Funding

IMPROVING PREDICTION OF IDDMR01DK053456 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HERMAN, MARK A, REDONDO, MARIA JOSE · 1999 to 2021
$9.5M
ISLET CELL MEMBRANE ANTIBODIES IN DIABTESR01DK026190 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAMPE, CHRISTIANE S · 1986 to 2016
$4.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK026190NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK053456NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK53456-05A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoantibodies to insulin (IAA) are one of the first markers of the autoimmune process leading to type 1 diabetes (T1D). While other autoantibodies in T1D have been studied extensively, relatively little is known about IAA and their binding specificities, especially after insulin treatment is initiated. We hypothesize that insulin antibodies (IA) that develop upon initiation of insulin treatment differ in their epitope specificities from IAA. We analysed insulin antibody binding specificities in longitudinal samples of T1D patients (n = 49). Samples were taken at clinical diagnosis of disease and after insulin treatment was initiated. The epitope specificities were analysed using recombinant Fab (rFab) derived from insulin-specific monoclonal antibodies AE9D6 and CG7C7. Binding of radiolabelled insulin by samples taken at onset of the disease was significantly reduced in the presence of rFab CG7C7 and AE9D6. rFab AE9D6 competed sera binding to insulin significantly better than rFab CG7C7 (P = 0.02). Binding to the AE9D6-defined epitope in the initial sample was correlated inversely with age at onset (P = 0.005). The binding to the AE9D6-defined epitope increased significantly (P < 0.0001) after 3 months of insulin treatment. Binding to the CG7C7-defined epitope did not change during the analysed period of 12 months. We conclude that epitopes recognized by insulin binding antibodies can be identified using monoclonal insulin-specific rFab as competitors. Using this approach we observed that insulin treatment is accompanied by a change in epitope specificities in the emerging IA.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibody SpecificityAutoantibodiesBinding, CompetitiveChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1EpitopesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsInsulinInsulin AntibodiesLongitudinal StudiesRecombinant ProteinsAutoantibodiesEpitopesHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsInsulinInsulin AntibodiesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16968392
PMCPMC1809737
OpenAlexW2040309970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.