ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2006
The chernobyl accident 20 years on: an assessment of the health consequences and the international response.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- From survival of irradiated mice to modern molecular insights: a seventy-year journey in radiobiology at the institute of biophysics, Czech academy of sciences.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2025Review
- Quantitative modeling of radioactive cesium concentrations in large omnivorous mammals after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Adiponectin and Thyroid Cancer: Insight into the Association between Adiponectin and Obesity.Aging and disease · 2021Review
- Dose and Dose-Rate Effects in a Mouse Model of Internal Exposure from 137Cs. Part 2: Integration of Gamma-H2AX and Gene Expression Biomarkers for Retrospective Radiation Biodosimetry.Radiation research · 2020Article
- Sex Difference of Radiation Response in Occupational and Accidental Exposure.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Long-Term Consequences of the Chernobyl Radioactive Fallout: An Exploration of the Aggregate Data.The Milbank quarterly · 2018Article
- Chernobyl: more systematic research needed!European journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
- Effective dose estimation and lifetime cancer mortality risk assessment from exposure to Chernobyl 137Cs on the territory of Belgrade City and the region of Vojvodina, Serbia.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2011Article
- Lessons learned from radiation disasters.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2011Article
- Growing up in the shadow of Chornobyl: adolescents' risk perceptions and mental health.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2011Article
- Nuclear detonation, thyroid cancer and potassium iodide prophylaxis.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2011Article
- Effects of the chernobyl disaster on thyroid cancer incidence in Turkey after 22 years.ISRN surgery · 2011Article
- Subjective health legacy of the Chornobyl accident: a comparative study of 19-year olds in Kyiv.BMC public health · 2009Article
- Exposure from the Chernobyl accident had adverse effects on erythrocytes, leukocytes, and, platelets in children in the Narodichesky region, Ukraine: a 6-year follow-up study.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2008Article
- Determinants of participation in a longitudinal two-stage study of the health consequences of the Chornobyl nuclear power plant accident.BMC medical research methodology · 2008Article
- The Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe: unacknowledged health detriment.Environmental health perspectives · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Chernobyl accident in 1986 caused widespread radioactive contamination and enormous concern. Twenty years later, the World Health Organization and the International Atomic Energy Authority issued a generally reassuring statement about the consequences. Accurate assessment of the consequences is important to the current debate on nuclear power.
objectivesOur objectives in this study were to evaluate the health impact of the Chernobyl accident, assess the international response to the accident, and consider how to improve responses to future accidents. DISCUSSION: So far, radiation to the thyroid from radioisotopes of iodine has caused several thousand cases of thyroid cancer but very few deaths ; exposed children were most susceptible. The focus on thyroid cancer has diverted attention from possible nonthyroid effects, such as mini-satellite instability, which is potentially important. The international response to the accident was inadequate and uncoordinated, and has been unjustifiably reassuring. Accurate assessment of Chernobyl's future health effects is not currently possible in the light of dose uncertainties, current debates over radiation actions, and the lessons from the late consequences of atomic bomb exposure.
conclusionsBecause of the uncertainties over the dose from and the consequences of the Chernobyl accident, it is essential that investigations of its effects should be broadened and supported for the long term. Because of the problems with the international response to Chernobyl, the United Nations should initiate an independent review of the actions and assignments of the agencies concerned, with recommendations for dealing with future international-scale accidents. These should involve independent scientists and ensure cooperation rather than rivalry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.