ArticleJournal of bacteriology2006
Two chemosensory operons of Rhodobacter sphaeroides are regulated independently by sigma 28 and sigma 54.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Living in a Foster Home: The Single Subpolar Flagellum Fla1 ofBiomolecules · 2020Review
- The Master Regulators of the Fla1 and Fla2 Flagella of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Control the Expression of Their Cognate CheY Proteins.Journal of bacteriology · 2017Article
- The flagellar set Fla2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides is controlled by the CckA pathway and is repressed by organic acids and the expression of Fla1.Journal of bacteriology · 2015Article
- A minimal model for metabolism-dependent chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides (†).Interface focus · 2014Article
- Modelling and analysis of bacterial tracks suggest an active reorientation mechanism in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Article
- A distant homologue of the FlgT protein interacts with MotB and FliL and is essential for flagellar rotation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.Journal of bacteriology · 2013Article
- Regulation of flagellum number by FliA and FlgM and role in biofilm formation by Rhodobacter sphaeroides.Journal of bacteriology · 2011Article
- Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2011Review
- Comparative genomics of Geobacter chemotaxis genes reveals diverse signaling function.BMC genomics · 2008Article
- Transcriptome dynamics during the transition from anaerobic photosynthesis to aerobic respiration in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.Journal of bacteriology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory system, with several loci encoding multiple homologues of the components required for chemosensing in Escherichia coli. The operons cheOp2 and cheOp3 each encode complete pathways, and both are essential for chemosensing. The components of cheOp2 are predominantly localized to the cell pole, whereas those encoded by cheOp3 are predominantly targeted to a discrete cluster in the cytoplasm. Here we show that the expression of the two pathways is regulated independently. Overlapping promoters recognized by sigma(28) and sigma(70) RNAP holoenzyme transcribe cheOp2, whereas cheOp3 is regulated by one of the four sigma(54) homologues, RpoN3. The different regulation of these operons may reflect the need for balancing responses to extra- and intracellular signals under different growth conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.