Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16963482›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2007

Clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterisation of a newly recognised microdeletion syndrome involving 2p15-16.1.

E Rajcan-Separovic, C Harvard, X Liu, B McGillivray, J G Hall, Y Qiao, J Hurlburt, J Hildebrand, E C R Mickelson, J J A Holden and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Rare Case ofThe application of clinical genetics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Novel de novo Frameshift Mutation in theMolecular syndromology · 2020
    Article
  11. Utility of clinical exome sequencing in a complex Emirati pediatric cohort.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular neuropsychiatry · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Haploinsufficiency ofMolecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E Rajcan-Separovic
C Harvard
X Liu
B McGillivray
J G Hall
Y Qiao
J Hurlburt
J Hildebrand
E C R Mickelson
J J A Holden
M E S Lewis
University of British Columbia · CAQueen's University · CAChild and Family Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring whole genome microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) screening of subjects with idiopathic intellectual disability, we identified two unrelated individuals with a similar de novo interstitial microdeletion at 2p15-2p16.1. Both individuals share a similar clinical phenotype including moderate to severe intellectual disability, autism/autistic features, microcephaly, structural brain anomalies including cortical dysplasia/pachygyria, renal anomalies (multicystic kidney, hydronephrosis), digital camptodactyly, visual impairment, strabismus, neuromotor deficits, communication and attention impairments, and a distinctive pattern of craniofacial features. Dysmorphic craniofacial features include progressive microcephaly, flat occiput, widened inner canthal distance, small palpebral fissures, ptosis, long and straight eyelashes, broad and high nasal root extending to a widened, prominent nasal tip with elongated, smooth philtrum, rounding of the upper vermillion border and everted lower lips.

methodsClinical assessments, and cytogenetic, array CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analyses were performed.

resultsThe microdeletions discovered in each individual measured 4.5 Mb and 5.7 Mb, spanning the chromosome 2p region from 57.2 to 61.7 Mb and from 56 to 61.7 Mb, respectively. Each deleted clone in this range demonstrated a dosage reduction from two to one copy in each proband except for clone RP11-79K21, which was present in three copies in each proband and in four copies in their respective parents (two per each chromosome 2 homologue). DISCUSSION: The common constellation of features found in the two affected subjects indicates that they have a newly recognised microdeletion syndrome involving haploinsufficiency of one or more genes deleted within at least a 4.5-Mb segment of the 2p15-16.1 region.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionAbnormalities, MultipleAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutistic DisorderBrainChildChromosome DisordersChromosomes, Human, Pair 2Craniofacial AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKidneyMaleNucleic Acid Hybridization

Identifiers

PMID16963482
PMCPMC2598046
OpenAlexW2063065808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.