Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16961921›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2006

AgBase: a functional genomics resource for agriculture.

Fiona M McCarthy, Nan Wang, G Bryce Magee, Bindu Nanduri, Mark L Lawrence, Evelyn B Camon, Daniel G Barrell, David P Hill, Mary E Dolan, W Paul Williams and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reference-based chromosome-scale assembly of Japanese barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) cultivar Hayakiso 2.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Adaptation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Phylogenomic diversity ofMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mining the Wheat Grain Proteome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unravelling the Initial Triggers ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona M McCarthyDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA. fmccarthy@cvm.msstate.edu
Nan Wang
G Bryce Magee
Bindu Nanduri
Mark L Lawrence
Evelyn B Camon
Daniel G Barrell
David P Hill
Mary E Dolan
W Paul Williams
Dawn S Luthe
Susan M Bridges
Shane C Burgess
Mississippi State University · USJackson Laboratory · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany agricultural species and their pathogens have sequenced genomes and more are in progress. Agricultural species provide food, fiber, xenotransplant tissues, biopharmaceuticals and biomedical models. Moreover, many agricultural microorganisms are human zoonoses. However, systems biology from functional genomics data is hindered in agricultural species because agricultural genome sequences have relatively poor structural and functional annotation and agricultural research communities are smaller with limited funding compared to many model organism communities. DESCRIPTION: To facilitate systems biology in these traditionally agricultural species we have established "AgBase", a curated, web-accessible, public resource http://www.agbase.msstate.edu for structural and functional annotation of agricultural genomes. The AgBase database includes a suite of computational tools to use GO annotations. We use standardized nomenclature following the Human Genome Organization Gene Nomenclature guidelines and are currently functionally annotating chicken, cow and sheep gene products using the Gene Ontology (GO). The computational tools we have developed accept and batch process data derived from different public databases (with different accession codes), return all existing GO annotations, provide a list of products without GO annotation, identify potential orthologs, model functional genomics data using GO and assist proteomics analysis of ESTs and EST assemblies. Our journal database helps prevent redundant manual GO curation. We encourage and publicly acknowledge GO annotations from researchers and provide a service for researchers interested in GO and analysis of functional genomics data.

conclusionThe AgBase database is the first database dedicated to functional genomics and systems biology analysis for agriculturally important species and their pathogens. We use experimental data to improve structural annotation of genomes and to functionally characterize gene products. AgBase is also directly relevant for researchers in fields as diverse as agricultural production, cancer biology, biopharmaceuticals, human health and evolutionary biology. Moreover, the experimental methods and bioinformatics tools we provide are widely applicable to many other species including model organisms.

Indexed as

AgricultureDatabases, GeneticGenomicsAnimalsDatabases, ProteinGenomeHumans

Identifiers

PMID16961921
PMCPMC1618847
OpenAlexW2116054833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.