ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1990
Interactions of palmitoyl carnitine with the endothelium in rat aorta.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Palmitoyl carnitine (10-1000 microM) resembled Bay K 8644 (10-1000 nM) in that it directly contracted rat aortic rings which were partially depolarized with K+ (12 mM). However, the effects of Bay K 8644 were reduced in the presence of endothelium whereas the presence of the endothelium hardly affected the palmitoyl carnitine-induced contractions, which occurred at high concentrations (greater than 10 microM). 2. Lower concentrations of palmitoyl carnitine (0.3-30 microM; EC50 1.1 microM), but not Bay K 8644, carnitine or palmitic acid, antagonized the relaxant effects of acetylcholine in rat aorta. The antagonism was specific for endothelium-dependent relaxations, in that the relaxations to ATP and the calcium ionophore A23187 were also non-competitively antagonized, albeit at slightly higher concentrations, whereas the direct relaxant effects of sodium nitroprusside were unaffected. Palmitoyl carnitine therefore antagonizes the effects or the release of endothelial-derived relaxant factor (EDRF). The inhibitory effects were reversed on prolonged washout, indicating that the effects were not due to destruction of the endothelial cells. 3. In superfusion experiments, palmitoyl carnitine inhibited the release of EDRF from rat aorta but did not affect the responsiveness to exogenous EDRF, indicating a site of action at the endothelial cell. In superfusion experiments, palmitoyl carnitine, and lysophosphatidyl choline, caused direct relaxations of the aorta, indicating EDRF release, prior to inhibition of release evoked by receptor stimulation. These substances may modulate vascular responsiveness under certain conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.