ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1990
Selective antagonism of calcium channel activators by fluspirilene.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Neuroprotective properties of lifarizine compared with those of other agents in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischaemia.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Fluspirilene block of N-type calcium current in NGF-differentiated PC12 cells.British journal of pharmacology · 1994Article
- Identification of a novel calcium antagonist binding site in rat brain by SR 33557.British journal of pharmacology · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Fluspirilene has been claimed to bind to a high affinity site in the calcium channel in skeletal muscle. We have investigated its calcium-antagonistic effects in smooth muscle and affinity for the channel in radioligand binding assays. 2. Fluspirilene was weakly active as an antagonist of Ca2(+)-induced contractions in K(+)-depolarized taenia preparations from the guinea-pig caecum, with threshold antagonism starting from concentrations of 30 nM. Nitrendipine, nicardipine and nimodipine were very potent antagonists in this model (threshold antagonism, greater than 1 nM). 3. In contrast, fluspirilene (10-1000 nM) was a potent non-competitive antagonist of the effects of Bay K 8644 (1-3000 nM) on Ca2(+)-induced contractions and, at 10 nM, selectively antagonised the effects of Bay K 8644, abolished the Ca2(+)-channel activator effects of CGP 28392, without changing the calcium antagonist effects of nitrendipine, or modifying the sensitivity of the tissues to Ca2+. In contrast, the dihydropyridines were more effective as antagonists of Ca2+ than of Bay K 8644. Fluspirilene therefore selectively antagonised the effects of dihydropyridine Ca2+ channel activators without affecting the antagonist potency. 4. In radioligand binding experiments, fluspirilene was a potent displacer of [3H]-PN-200-110 binding to rat cerebral cortical membranes (EC50 30 nM), albeit with a low Hill slope (0.66), and was more potent than other lipophilic diphenylalkylamines such as flunarizine and lidoflazine. Fluspirilene interacted non-competitively with [3H]-PN-200-110 and increased dissociation of the radioligand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.