Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16960107›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2006

Probiotics stimulate production of natural antibodies in chickens.

Hamid R Haghighi, Jianhua Gong, Carlton L Gyles, M Anthony Hayes, Huaijun Zhou, Babak Sanei, James R Chambers, Shayan Sharif

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 277 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immune-Stimulating Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of treatment withFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of Probiotics on Growth and Immunity of Piglets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hamid R HaghighiDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
Jianhua Gong
Carlton L Gyles
M Anthony Hayes
Huaijun Zhou
Babak Sanei
James R Chambers
Shayan Sharif
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commensal bacteria in the intestine play an important role in the development of immune response. These bacteria interact with cells of the gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT). Among cells of the GALT, B-1 cells are of note. These cells are involved in the production of natural antibodies. In the present study, we determined whether manipulation of the intestinal microbiota by administration of probiotics, which we had previously shown to enhance specific systemic antibody response, could affect the development of natural antibodies in the intestines and sera of chickens. Our findings demonstrate that when 1-day-old chicks were treated with probiotics, serum and intestinal antibodies reactive to tetanus toxoid (TT) and Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin in addition to intestinal immunoglobulin A (IgA) reactive to bovine serum albumin (BSA) were increased in unimmunized chickens. Moreover, IgG antibodies reactive to TT were increased in the intestines of probiotic-treated chickens compared to those of untreated controls. In serum, IgG and IgM reactive to TT and alpha-toxin were increased in probiotic-treated, unimmunized chickens compared to levels in untreated controls. However, no significant difference in serum levels of IgM or IgG response to BSA was observed. These results are suggestive of the induction of natural antibodies in probiotic-treated, unimmunized chickens. Elucidating the role of these antibodies in maintenance of the chicken immune system homeostasis and immune response to pathogens requires further investigation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntibody FormationCattleChickensEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MIntestinal MucosaProbioticsRandom AllocationSerum Albumin, BovineTetanus ToxoidType C PhospholipasesAntibodiesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSerum Albumin, BovineTetanus ToxoidType C Phospholipases

Identifiers

PMID16960107
PMCPMC1563569
OpenAlexW2142440912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.