Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16959970›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2006

Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world.

Josep Casadesús, David Low

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 325 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
325citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

325 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 656 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epigenetic regulation of transgenes.Journal of biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Characterization of a novel phage-plasmid vB_EcoM_ED targeting multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

265 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Josep CasadesúsDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville 41080, Spain.
David Low
Universidad de Sevilla · ESUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

THE ROLE OF DNA METHYLATION IN PILI GENE REGULATIONR01AI023348 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI LOW, DAVID ALAN · 1987 to 2006
$1.2M
DNA Methylation and Pili Gene RegulationR21AI023348 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI LOW, DAVID ALAN · 2002 to 2002
$292k
NIAID NIH HHS AI23348NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI023348NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI023348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like many eukaryotes, bacteria make widespread use of postreplicative DNA methylation for the epigenetic control of DNA-protein interactions. Unlike eukaryotes, however, bacteria use DNA adenine methylation (rather than DNA cytosine methylation) as an epigenetic signal. DNA adenine methylation plays roles in the virulence of diverse pathogens of humans and livestock animals, including pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Vibrio, Yersinia, Haemophilus, and Brucella. In Alphaproteobacteria, methylation of adenine at GANTC sites by the CcrM methylase regulates the cell cycle and couples gene transcription to DNA replication. In Gammaproteobacteria, adenine methylation at GATC sites by the Dam methylase provides signals for DNA replication, chromosome segregation, mismatch repair, packaging of bacteriophage genomes, transposase activity, and regulation of gene expression. Transcriptional repression by Dam methylation appears to be more common than transcriptional activation. Certain promoters are active only during the hemimethylation interval that follows DNA replication; repression is restored when the newly synthesized DNA strand is methylated. In the E. coli genome, however, methylation of specific GATC sites can be blocked by cognate DNA binding proteins. Blockage of GATC methylation beyond cell division permits transmission of DNA methylation patterns to daughter cells and can give rise to distinct epigenetic states, each propagated by a positive feedback loop. Switching between alternative DNA methylation patterns can split clonal bacterial populations into epigenetic lineages in a manner reminiscent of eukaryotic cell differentiation. Inheritance of self-propagating DNA methylation patterns governs phase variation in the E. coli pap operon, the agn43 gene, and other loci encoding virulence-related cell surface functions.

Indexed as

BacteriaBase SequenceDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID16959970
PMCPMC1594586
OpenAlexW2103009708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.