Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16959180›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2006

Emerging periurethral bulking agents for female stress urinary incontinence: is new necessarily better?

Jonathan S Starkman, Harriette Scarpero, Roger R Dmochowski

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan S StarkmanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Harriette Scarpero
Roger R Dmochowski
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulking therapy for stress urinary incontinence in women continues to evolve from the standpoint of material science. Several new materials have recently been subjected to clinical trials with the aim of assessing efficacy and safety of these agents for possible device registration. These new additions run the gamut of biologic to synthetic materials, including re-engineered carbon-coated zirconium beads, ethylene vinyl copolymer, calcium hydroxylapatite, silicone, and hyaluronic acid. Trial design and results reporting for bulking agents has also evolved, with the addition of quality-of-life and patient approbation assessments now being included with outcomes for incontinence reduction and adverse events recording. The new agents and recent studies are reviewed within a context of the prior evidence that has supported the use of the bulking strategy for management of symptomatic stress incontinence. Several recent trials have also compared bulking agents with surgical interventions from effectiveness, approbation, and cost vantage points so as to better determine the reasonability of bulking agent use in an era of minimally invasive incontinence surgery.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInjectionsUrethraUrinary Incontinence, StressBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID16959180
OpenAlexW2034190127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.