ReviewCurrent urology reports2006
Emerging periurethral bulking agents for female stress urinary incontinence: is new necessarily better?
Review in Current urology reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Bulking Agents and Laser Therapy-An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bulking therapy for stress urinary incontinence in women continues to evolve from the standpoint of material science. Several new materials have recently been subjected to clinical trials with the aim of assessing efficacy and safety of these agents for possible device registration. These new additions run the gamut of biologic to synthetic materials, including re-engineered carbon-coated zirconium beads, ethylene vinyl copolymer, calcium hydroxylapatite, silicone, and hyaluronic acid. Trial design and results reporting for bulking agents has also evolved, with the addition of quality-of-life and patient approbation assessments now being included with outcomes for incontinence reduction and adverse events recording. The new agents and recent studies are reviewed within a context of the prior evidence that has supported the use of the bulking strategy for management of symptomatic stress incontinence. Several recent trials have also compared bulking agents with surgical interventions from effectiveness, approbation, and cost vantage points so as to better determine the reasonability of bulking agent use in an era of minimally invasive incontinence surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.