Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16959036›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2006

Generalization of DNA microarray dispersion properties: microarray equivalent of t-distribution.

Jaroslav P Novak, Seon-Young Kim, Jun Xu, Olga Modlich, David J Volsky, David Honys, Joan L Slonczewski, Douglas A Bell, Fred R Blattner, Eduardo Blumwald and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microarray analysis of Xenopus endoderm expressing Ptf1a.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2012
    Article
  4. The signature of maternal rearing in the methylome in rhesus macaque prefrontal cortex and T cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jaroslav P NovakMcGill University and Genome Québec Innovation Centre, 740 Docteur Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Québec, H3A 1A4, Canada. jaroslav.novak@mail.mcgill.ca
Seon-Young Kim
Jun Xu
Olga Modlich
David J Volsky
David Honys
Joan L Slonczewski
Douglas A Bell
Fred R Blattner
Eduardo Blumwald
Marjan Boerma
Manuel Cosio
Zoran Gatalica
Marian Hajduch
Juan Hidalgo
Roderick R McInnes
Merrill C Miller
Milena Penkowa
Michael S Rolph
Jordan Sottosanto
Rene St-Arnaud
Michael J Szego
David Twell
Charles Wang

Funding

Role of EAAT2 and AEG-1 in Astrocyte Dysfunction and NeurodegenerationP01NS031492 · NINDS · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI GELBARD, HARRIS A · 1993 to 2007
$10.9M
Toward a Mouse Model of HIV-1 Infection and Drug AddictionR01DA017618 · NIDA · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI POTASH, MARY JANE, VOLSKY, DAVID J · 2004 to 2015
$6.2M
Discovery And Genetics Of Environmental Response GenesZ01ES100475 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BELL, DOUGLAS · 2002 to 2008
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017618NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS031492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA microarrays are a powerful technology that can provide a wealth of gene expression data for disease studies, drug development, and a wide scope of other investigations. Because of the large volume and inherent variability of DNA microarray data, many new statistical methods have been developed for evaluating the significance of the observed differences in gene expression. However, until now little attention has been given to the characterization of dispersion of DNA microarray data.

resultsHere we examine the expression data obtained from 682 Affymetrix GeneChips with 22 different types and we demonstrate that the Gaussian (normal) frequency distribution is characteristic for the variability of gene expression values. However, typically 5 to 15% of the samples deviate from normality. Furthermore, it is shown that the frequency distributions of the difference of expression in subsets of ordered, consecutive pairs of genes (consecutive samples) in pair-wise comparisons of replicate experiments are also normal. We describe a consecutive sampling method, which is employed to calculate the characteristic function approximating standard deviation and show that the standard deviation derived from the consecutive samples is equivalent to the standard deviation obtained from individual genes. Finally, we determine the boundaries of probability intervals and demonstrate that the coefficients defining the intervals are independent of sample characteristics, variability of data, laboratory conditions and type of chips. These coefficients are very closely correlated with Student's t-distribution.

conclusionIn this study we ascertained that the non-systematic variations possess Gaussian distribution, determined the probability intervals and demonstrated that the K(alpha) coefficients defining these intervals are invariant; these coefficients offer a convenient universal measure of dispersion of data. The fact that the K(alpha) distributions are so close to t-distribution and independent of conditions and type of arrays suggests that the quantitative data provided by Affymetrix technology give "true" representation of physical processes, involved in measurement of RNA abundance. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Yoav Gilad (nominated by Doron Lancet), Sach Mukherjee (nominated by Sandrine Dudoit) and Amir Niknejad and Shmuel Friedland (nominated by Neil Smalheiser).

Identifiers

PMID16959036
PMCPMC1586001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.