ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2006
Treating the right patient at the right time: access to specialist consultation and non-invasive testing.
Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions on the Provision of Adult Congenital Heart Disease Care Across Canada: A National Survey.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023Article
- Association of Levels of Specialized Care With Risk of Premature Mortality in Patients With Epilepsy.JAMA neurology · 2019Article
- Integrating Telemedicine Into Training: Adding Value to Graduate Medical Education Through Electronic Consultations.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- Access to routine care and risks for 30-day readmission in patients with cardiovascular disease.American heart journal · 2018Article
- Waiting to see the specialist: patient and provider characteristics of wait times from primary to specialty care.BMC family practice · 2014Observational
- How established wait time benchmarks significantly underestimate total wait times for cardiac surgery.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2010Article
- Cardiac EASE (Ensuring Access and Speedy Evaluation) - the impact of a single-point-of-entry multidisciplinary outpatient cardiology consultation program on wait times in Canada.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2009Article
- Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009Article
- Treating the right patient at the right time: an innovative approach to the management of atrial fibrillation.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Article
- A commentary on access to cardiovascular services: nursing roles and initiatives.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Article
- Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to echocardiography in Canada.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2006Article
- Too many patients, too few cardiologists to care?The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Council of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society commissioned working groups to examine issues of access to, and wait times for, various aspects of cardiovascular care. The present article summarizes the deliberations on targets for medically acceptable wait times for access to cardiovascular specialist evaluation and on the performance of noninvasive testing needed to complete this evaluation. Three categories of referral indications were identified: those requiring hospitalization due to substantial ongoing risk of mortality and morbidity; those requiring an expedited early review in an ambulatory setting; and, finally, a larger category in which delays of two to six weeks can be justified. The proposed wait time targets will provide guidance on the timeliness of care to busy clinicians charged with the care of patients with cardiovascular disease, help policy makers appreciate the clinical challenges in providing access to high quality care, and highlight the critical need for a thoughtful review of cardiology human resource requirements. Wait time implementation suggestions are also included, such as the innovative use of disease management and special need clinics. The times proposed assume that available clinical practice guidelines are followed for clinical coronary syndrome management and for treatment of associated conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, renal disease, smoking cessation and lipid disorders. Although media attention tends to focus on wait times for higher profile surgical procedures and high technology imaging, it is likely that patients face the greatest wait-related risk at the earlier phases of care, before the disease has been adequately characterized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.