Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16957767›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2006

Gene therapy progress and prospects: the skin--easily accessible, but still far away.

U R Hengge

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Barriers to Liposomal Gene Delivery: from Application Site to the Target.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Nonviral human beta defensin-3 expression in a bioengineered human skin tissue: a therapeutic alternative for infected wounds.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

U R HenggeDepartment of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany. ulrich.hengge@uni-duesseldorf.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant progress has been made in corrective gene therapy of inherited skin diseases. This includes advances in vector technology, targeted gene expression, gene replacement, and the availability of appropriate animal models for a variety of candidate diseases. In addition, an increased understanding of the uptake and trafficking mechanisms inside keratinocytes has evolved. Topical application facilitates DNA vaccination through the skin, albeit clinical benefits have not yet materialized. However, the translation into clinical trials has only been partially mastered. The latter and the control of immune responses represent challenges for the research community.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAForecastingGene ExpressionGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansModels, AnimalSkinSkin AbsorptionSkin DiseasesVaccines, DNADNAVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID16957767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.