ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2006
Blood pressure components in clinical hypertension.
Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review offers a critical evaluation of the remarkable progress in antihypertensive therapy since its inception. Despite the introduction of newer, more sophisticated drugs, treatment results have remained stable. Problems impeding further improvement include limited patient compliance, clinical inertia, incomplete adherence to guidelines, and dependence on brachial artery cuff pressures for diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment response. Brachial artery systolic and pulse pressures do not reliably represent aortic or carotid artery pressures, which are better risk predictors for the heart and brain. Mean pressure, which is the same throughout the arterial tree, is directly measurable by cuff oscillometry, and might become the best single risk predictor. Available drugs have limited ability to decrease the aortic stiffness that is responsible for the elevated systolic blood pressure of aging. Therefore, to improve risk assessment and therapeutic benefit, we might include mean blood pressure and pulse pressure into blood pressure measurements, pursue efforts to measure central blood pressure, and search for new drugs to reduce arterial stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.