Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16957214›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2006

Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water: effect of the number of samples and analytic replicates on test results.

Lihua Xiao, Kerri A Alderisio, Jianlin Jiang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  2. Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Label-Free Capacitive Biosensor for Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  7. Subtype analysis of zoonotic pathogen Cryptosporidium skunk genotype.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2017
    Article
  8. Fine-Scale Spatial Heterogeneity in the Distribution of Waterborne Protozoa in a Drinking Water Reservoir.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  9. Comparison of nested PCR and microscopy for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovine calves.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cryptosporidium source tracking in the Potomac River watershed.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2008
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Cryptosporidium genotypes in wildlife from a new york watershed.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lihua XiaoDivision of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Building 22, Mail Stop F-12, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA. lxiao@cdc.gov
Kerri A Alderisio
Jianlin Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the small number of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water, the number of samples taken and the analyses performed can affect the results of detection. In this study, 42 water samples were collected from one watershed during 20 storm events over 1 year, including duplicate or quadruplicate samples from 16 storm events. Ten samples from four events had three to eight subsamples. They were processed by EPA method 1623, and Cryptosporidium oocysts present were detected by immunofluorescent microscopy or PCR. Altogether, 24 of 39 samples (47 of 67 samples and subsamples) analyzed by microscopy were positive for Cryptosporidium. In contrast, 36 of 42 samples (62 of 76 samples and subsamples) were positive by PCR, including 10 microscopy-negative samples (13 microscopy-negative samples and subsamples). Six of the 24 microscopy-positive samples were negative by PCR, and all samples had one or less oocyst in a 0.5-ml packed pellet volume calculated. Discordant results were obtained by microscopy and PCR from six and three of the storm events, respectively, with multiple samples. Discordant microscopy or PCR results were also obtained among subsamples. Most of the 14 Cryptosporidium genotypes were found over a brief period. Cryptosporidium-positive samples had a mean of 1.9 genotypes per sample, with 39 of the 62 positive samples/subsamples having more than one genotype. Samples/subsamples with more than one genotype had an overall PCR-positive rate of 73%, compared to 34% for those with one genotype. The PCR amplification rate of samples was affected by the volume of DNA used in PCR.

Indexed as

AnimalsCryptosporidiumDNA, ProtozoanGenotypeMolecular Sequence DataNew YorkOocystsParasitologyPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSample SizeWaterDNA, ProtozoanWater

Identifiers

PMID16957214
PMCPMC1563632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.