Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16956911›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2007

Tacrolimus immunosuppression in high-risk corneal grafts.

A Joseph, D Raj, V Shanmuganathan, R J Powell, H S Dua

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Corneal xenotransplantation: Where are we standing?Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics.Journal of clinical & cellular immunology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A JosephDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
D Raj
V Shanmuganathan
R J Powell
H S Dua
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnlike the immune privilege enjoyed by low-risk corneal grafts, high-risk corneal grafts experience rejection rates comparable to liver and kidney transplants. Systemic immunosuppression reduces the risk of rejection in high-risk corneal grafts.

methodsSystemic tacrolimus, a specific T cell inhibitor, was used at a mean daily dose of 2.5 mg to immunosuppress 43 patients undergoing high-risk corneal transplantation. Immunosuppression was continued for a period of 18-24 months after the high-risk corneal graft.

resultsDuring a mean follow-up period of 33.7 months, clarity of the graft was maintained in 65% of patients. Eight patients experienced rejection episodes while on tacrolimus, and this led to graft failure in five patients.

conclusionTacrolimus is relatively safe and effective in reducing rejection and prolonging graft survival in patients with high-risk keratoplasty compared with other series where similar immunosuppression was not used.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTacrolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID16956911
PMCPMC1857574
OpenAlexW1965538727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.