Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16955237›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2006

Mammalian male mutation bias: impacts of generation time and regional variation in substitution rates.

M Paula Goetting-Minesky, Kateryna D Makova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome analyses substantiate male mutation bias in many species.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The genome as a life-history character: why rate of molecular evolution varies between mammal species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Paula Goetting-MineskyDepartment of Biology, Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, 518A Mueller Lab, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, USA.
Kateryna D Makova
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Male Mutation Bias and Paternal Age Effect in MammalsR01GM072264 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MAKOVA, KATERYNA · 2004 to 2010
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM072264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, males undergo a greater number of germline cell divisions compared with females. Thus, the male germline accumulates more DNA replication errors, which result in male mutation bias-a higher mutation rate for males than for females. The phenomenon of male mutation bias has been investigated mostly for rodents and primates, however, it has not been studied in detail for other mammalian orders. Here we sequenced and analyzed five introns of three genes (DBX/DBY, UTX/UTY, and ZFX/ZFY) homologous between X and Y chromosomes in several species of perissodactyls (horses and rhinos) and of primates. Male mutation bias was evident: substitution rate was higher for a Y chromosome intron than for its X chromosome homologue for all five intron pairs studied. Substitution rates varied regionally among introns sequenced on the same chromosome and this variation influenced male mutation bias inferred from each intron pair. Interestingly, we observed a positive correlation in substitution rates between homologous X and homologous Y introns as well as between orthologous primate and perissodactyl introns. The male-to-female mutation rate ratio estimated from concatenated sequences of five perissodactyl introns was 3.88 (95% CI = 2.90-6.07). Using the data generated here and estimates available in the literature, we compared male mutation bias among several mammalian orders. We conclude that male mutation bias is significantly higher for organisms with long generation times (primates, perissodactyls, and felids) than for organisms with short generation times (e.g., rodents) since the former undergo a greater number of male germline cell divisions.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSex CharacteristicsAgingAnimalsBase SequenceHumansIntronsMaleMutationPhylogenyReproductionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16955237
OpenAlexW2061353983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.