Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16954475›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2006

Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.

Electra Paskett, Cathy Tatum, Julia Rushing, Robert Michielutte, Ronny Bell, Kristie Long Foley, Marisa Bittoni, Stephanie L Dickinson, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Katherine Reeves

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of patient navigation programs across the entire continuum of breast cancer care: a GRADE-assessed systematic review with meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.Patient education and counseling · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2011
    Pooled it
  11. A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Experiences with a Community Health Volunteer-Led Cervical Cancer Educational Module in Migori County, Kenya.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Trial
  12. Mammography Adherence in African-American Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2016
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Randomized trial of a lay health advisor and computer intervention to increase mammography screening in African American women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2010
    Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Electra PaskettDivision of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University School of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. electra.paskett@osumc.edu
Cathy Tatum
Julia Rushing
Robert Michielutte
Ronny Bell
Kristie Long Foley
Marisa Bittoni
Stephanie L Dickinson
Ann Scheck McAlearney
Katherine Reeves
The Ohio State University · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

BREAST CANCER SCREENING IN A TRI-RACIAL RURAL POPULATIONR01CA072022 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 1997 to 2000
$638k
INTERVENTION RESEARCH TRAINING GRANT--CANCER PREVENTIONR25CA057707 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI AVIS, NANCY E · 1992 to 2001
$614k
NCI NIH HHS CA57707-08NCI NIH HHS CA72022-04NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072022NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMammography is underused by certain groups of women, in particular poor and minority women. We developed a lay health advisor (LHA) intervention based on behavioral theories and tested whether it improved mammography attendance in Robeson County, NC, a rural, low-income, triracial (white, Native American, African American) population.

methodsA total of 851 women who had not had a mammogram within the past year were randomly assigned to the LHA intervention (n = 433) or to a comparison arm (n = 418) during 1998-2002. Rates of mammography use after 12-14 months (as verified by medical record review) were compared using a chi-square test. Baseline and follow-up (at 12-14 months) surveys were used to obtain information on demographics, risk factors, and barriers, beliefs, and knowledge about mammography. Linear regression, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and logistic regression were used to compare barriers, beliefs, and knowledge from baseline to follow-up and to identify baseline factors associated with mammography.

resultsAt follow-up, 42.5% of the women in the LHA group and 27.3% of those in the comparison group had had a mammogram in the previous 12 months (relative risk = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29 to 1.87). Compared with those in the comparison group, women in the LHA group displayed statistically significantly better belief scores (difference = 0.46 points on a 0-10 scale, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.77) and reduced barriers at follow-up (difference = -0.77 points, 95% CI = -1.02 to -0.53), after adjusting for baseline scores.

conclusionsLHA interventions can improve mammography utilization. Future studies are needed to assess strategies to disseminate effective LHA interventions to underserved populations.

Indexed as

Health EducationHealth PromotionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLinear ModelsMammographyMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaOdds RatioPovertyRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID16954475
PMCPMC4450352
OpenAlexW2129201785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.