ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006
Clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci recovered from nonsterile sites.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Bacteriological Profile of Breast Abscesses.Cureus · 2025Article
- The Opportunistic PathogenAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Linezolid resistant coagulase negative staphylococci (LRCoNS) with novel mutations causing blood stream infections (BSI) in India.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Article
- Effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus virulence factor profiles in patients undergoing cataract surgery.International ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Implementation of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry in Routine Clinical Laboratories Improves Identification of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Reveals the Pathogenic Role of Staphylococcus lugdunensis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- Moving towards the immunodiagnosis of staphylococcal intramammary infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014Review
- Multi-virulence-locus sequence typing of Staphylococcus lugdunensis generates results consistent with a clonal population structure and is reliable for epidemiological typing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- The pathogenicity of Staphylococcus epidermidis on the intestinal organs of rats and mice: an experimental investigation.BMC gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis native tricuspid valve endocarditis: a case report and review of literature.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011Review
- Microbiological characteristics, presumptive identification, and antibiotic susceptibilities of Staphylococcus lugdunensis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- From clinical microbiology to infection pathogenesis: how daring to be different works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2008Review
- Poly-N-acetylglucosamine is not a major component of the extracellular matrix in biofilms formed by icaADBC-positive Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates.Infection and immunity · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory criteria were used to select coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from nonsterile body sites for further investigation. Fifty-seven percent of the study isolates were clinically significant, predominantly causing community-acquired soft tissue infections. There were species-related differences in virulence, with 91% of Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates clinically significant compared with 11% of S. haemolyticus isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.