Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16954267›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Prevalence of newer beta-lactamases in gram-negative clinical isolates collected in the United States from 2001 to 2002.

Ellen S Moland, Nancy D Hanson, Jennifer A Black, Ashfaque Hossain, Wonkeun Song, Kenneth S Thomson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Characterization of ESBL/AmpC-ProducingInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Impact of InducibleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  15. Genetic Diversity, Multidrug Resistance, and Virulence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Antimicrobial Resistance and Cytotoxicity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen S MolandDepartment of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, Center for Research in Anti-Infectives and Biotechnology, CRAB, School of Medicine, Creighton University Medical Center, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Nancy D Hanson
Jennifer A Black
Ashfaque Hossain
Wonkeun Song
Kenneth S Thomson
CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newer beta-lactamases such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), transferable AmpC beta-lactamases, and carbapenemases are associated with laboratory testing problems of false susceptibility that can lead to inappropriate therapy for infected patients. Because there appears to be a lack of awareness of these enzymes, a study was conducted during 2001 to 2002 in which 6,421 consecutive, nonduplicate clinical isolates of aerobically growing gram-negative bacilli from patients at 42 intensive care unit (ICU) and 21 non-ICU sites across the United States were tested on-site for antibiotic susceptibility. From these isolates, 746 screen-positive isolates (11.6%) were referred to a research facility and investigated to determine the prevalence of ESBLs in all gram-negative isolates, transferable AmpC beta-lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae, and carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae. The investigations involved phenotypic tests, isoelectric focusing, beta-lactamase inhibitor studies, spectrophotometric assays, induction assays, and molecular analyses. ESBLs were detected only in Enterobacteriaceae (4.9% of all Enterobacteriaceae) and were found in species other than those currently recommended for ESBL testing by the CLSI (formerly NCCLS). These isolates occurred at 74% of the ICU sites and 43% of the non-ICU sites. Transferable AmpC beta-lactamases were detected in 3.3% of K. pneumoniae isolates and at 16 of the 63 sites (25%) with no difference between ICU and non-ICU sites. Three sites submitted isolates that produced class A carbapenemases. No class B or D carbapenemases were detected. In conclusion, organisms producing ESBLs and transferable AmpC beta-lactamases were widespread. Clinical laboratories must be able to detect important beta-lactamases to ensure optimal patient care and infection control.

Indexed as

beta-Lactam ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceUnited StatesAmpC beta-lactamasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasescarbapenemase

Identifiers

PMID16954267
PMCPMC1594717
OpenAlexW2021212281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.