Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16954250›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Genital Candida species detected in samples from women in Melbourne, Australia, before and after treatment with antibiotics.

Marie V Pirotta, Suzanne M Garland

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01915251 (Microbiomic and Immunologic Profiling of Women With Antibiotic Induced Vaginal Candidiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01915251 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Microbiomic and Immunologic Profiling of Women With Antibiotic Induced Vaginal Candidiasis

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2013 to 2019Enrolled13ConditionsMicrobiome, Antibiotic-Induced VVC, Vaginal Candidiasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  8. Vulvovaginal candidiasis and current perspectives: new risk factors and laboratory diagnosis by using MALDI TOF for identifying species in primary infection and recurrence.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. An Update on the Roles of Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fungal Profile of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie V PirottaDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia. m.pirotta@unimelb.edu.au
Suzanne M Garland
Royal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) remains a common cause of morbidity, with three-quarters of women affected during their lifetimes. Use of antibiotics is an acknowledged trigger for VVC, which adversely affects women's physical and emotional health. Knowledge of patterns of genital Candida species-level identification is important for management, as Candida species other than Candida albicans often fail first-line treatment. A community sample of women with no vaginal symptoms, and who were prescribed antibiotics, was recruited into this study, where the incidence of genital colonization by various Candida species was documented, as well as symptoms of VVC plus relevant associations, before and after treatment with antibiotics. Self-collected low vaginal swabs were taken prior to and 8 days after completion of antibiotic treatment, and data on various potential risk factors for VVC were collected simultaneously, with complete data being available for 233 participants. Baseline Candida species colonization was present in 21% of women (95% confidence intervals [CI], 17% to 27%), rising to 37% (95% CI, 31% to 44%) after antibiotic treatment. The primary species detected for either period was C. albicans (73%), with Candida glabrata detected in around 20%. Self-assessed proneness to VVC after antibiotic treatment and baseline colonization with Candida spp. were significantly associated with symptomatic VVC after antibiotic treatment. For microbiologically proven candidiasis, VVC symptoms had a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 91%. When physicians prescribe antibiotics, the history of risk of VVC is one issue that physicians should discuss with women, particularly those who are self-identified as being prone to VVC. Furthermore, we recommend that definitive microbiological diagnoses be made for women with recurrent symptoms or those failing initial treatment, to guide appropriate therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAustraliaCandidaCandidiasis, VulvovaginalFemaleHumansIncidenceInfectionsMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSpecimen HandlingVaginaVaginitisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID16954250
PMCPMC1594690
OpenAlexW2113916306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.