Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16954241›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Evaluation of real-time and conventional PCR targeting complex 85 genes for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in skin biopsy samples from patients diagnosed with leprosy.

Alejandra N Martinez, Constança F P C Britto, José A C Nery, Elizabeth P Sampaio, Márcia R Jardim, Euzenir N Sarno, Milton O Moraes

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Detection ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Target product profiles: leprosy diagnostics.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolutionary history ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular detection ofMolecular biology research communications · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandra N MartinezLeprosy Laboratory, Mycobacterioses Department, Fiocruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-360, Brazil.
Constança F P C Britto
José A C Nery
Elizabeth P Sampaio
Márcia R Jardim
Euzenir N Sarno
Milton O Moraes
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of the decrease in the number of registered leprosy patients, the number of new cases diagnosed each year (400,000) has remained essentially unchanged. Leprosy diagnosis is difficult due to the low sensitivity of current methodologies to identify new cases. In this study, conventional and TaqMan real-time PCR assays for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA were compared to current classification based on clinical, bacteriological, and histological evaluation. M. leprae DNA was extracted from frozen skin biopsy specimens from 69 leprosy patients enrolled in the study and was amplified using specific primers for either the antigen 85B-coding gene or the 85A-C intergenic region by using conventional and real-time PCR. The detection rate was 100% among multibacillary (MB) patients and ranged from 62.5% to 79.2% among paucibacillary (PB) patients according to the assay used. The TaqMan system for 85B gene amplification showed the highest sensitivity, although conventional PCR using the 85A-C gene as a target was also efficient. The cycle threshold (C(T)) values obtained using the TaqMan system were able to statistically (P < 0.0001) differentiate MB (mean C(T), 28.06; standard deviation [SD], 4.51) from PB (mean C(T), 33.06; SD, 2.24) patients. Also, there was a correlation between C(T) values and the bacteriological index for MB patients (Pearson's r, -0.444; P = 0.008). Within the PB patients' group, we tested normal skin from six patients exhibiting the pure neuritic form of leprosy (PNL). Five out of six PNL patients were positive for the presence of M. leprae DNA, even in the absence of skin lesions. In conclusion, the TaqMan real-time PCR developed here seems to be a useful tool for rapidly detecting and quantifying M. leprae DNA in clinical specimens in which bacilli were undetectable by conventional histological staining.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBiopsyDNA, BacterialHumansLeprosyMycobacterium lepraePolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySkinTaq Polymeraseantigen 85B, Mycobacterium lepraeAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialTaq Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID16954241
PMCPMC1594745
OpenAlexW2108466723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.